Method and apparatus for reporting a buffer status

ABSTRACT

A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) reports a buffer status as part of scheduling information for enhanced dedicated channel (E-DCH) transmissions. For reporting the buffer status, the WTRU calculates a total amount of data available across all logical channels for which reporting is requested by a radio resource control (RRC) entity. The total amount of data includes an amount of data that is available for transmission and retransmission at a radio link control (RLC) entity and an amount of data that is available for transmission in a medium access control for enhanced dedicated channel (MAC-i/is) segmentation entity in case that a MAC-i/is entity is configured. The WTRU sends scheduling information including a total E-DCH buffer status (TEBS) field that is set based on the total amount of data.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/372,031, filed on Feb. 13, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 12/537,714, filed on Aug. 7, 2009, whichissued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,274 on Feb. 14, 2012, which claims thebenefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/087,424 filedAug. 8, 2008, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by referenceherein.

FIELD OF INVENTION

This application is related to wireless communications.

BACKGROUND

Enhancements to layer 2 (L2) protocols, (i.e., medium access control(MAC) and radio link control (RLC)), for the high speed uplink packetaccess (HSUPA) have been introduced into the third generationpartnership project (3GPP) Release 8.These enhancements allow bettersupport of high data rates by introducing flexible RLC protocol dataunit (PDU) sizes along with segmentation capabilities at the MAC layerof the wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU). MAC-i/is sub-layer, (MACentity for handling enhanced dedicated channel (E-DCH)), includes asegmentation entity per logical channel identity. If a dedicated channelMAC (MAC-d) PDU or a common channel MAC (MAC-c) PDU does not fit intothe available transport block space, the MAC-i/is entity segments theMAC-d or MAC-c PDU and stores the remaining segment in the segmentationentity.

Since the introduction of the HSUPA in the 3GPP Release 6, mechanismshave been introduced to help the Node B scheduler assess the uplink datarate that the WTRU requires and assist the Node B to get a better viewof the amount of system resources needed by the WTRU and the amount ofresources the Node B can actually make use of. One of these mechanismsis scheduling information (SI) that may be included into a MAC-e orMAC-i PDU. The scheduling information includes a total E-DCH bufferstatus (TEBS) field which identifies the amount of data in number ofbytes that is available for transmission and retransmission in the RLClayer. The scheduling information also indicates a highest prioritylogical channel (HLID) with available data, the highest priority logicalchannel buffer status (HLBS), and the UE power headroom (UPH). The totallength of the scheduling information is 18 bits for frequency divisionduplex (FDD). For time division duplex (TDD) the scheduling informationfurther includes a field to assist the Node B with estimation of thedegree of inter-cell interference a WTRU will generate.

The scheduling information reporting is triggered according to a numberof different triggering mechanisms that are dependent on the value ofthe serving grant and the TEBS. The scheduling information reporting istriggered if the serving grant is equal to “zero” or all HARQ processesare deactivated, and the TEBS becomes larger than zero. The schedulinginformation reporting may be triggered periodically, which is configuredby RRC. Two different periodic triggers, (i.e., timers), may beconfigured for two cases. In the case where the serving grant is zero orall processes are deactivated, and TEBS is larger than zero, T_SING isthe timer that determines the periodicity of the triggering. In the casewhere the serving grant is not zero and at least one process isactivated, T_SIG is the timer that determines the periodicity of thetriggering. The scheduling information reporting may be triggered if theserving grant becomes too small to allow transmission of a single PDUfrom any scheduled MAC-d flow and TEBS becomes larger than zero. Thescheduling information reporting may be triggered if an E-DCH servingcell change occurs and the new E-DCH serving cell was not part of theprevious serving E-DCH radio link set (RLS). The scheduling informationis not transmitted if TEBS is zero, even if it is triggered by one ofthe configured triggering mechanisms.

A happy bit is an additional mechanism that allows the Node B to knowwhether the WTRU is happy with the current grant and resources allocatedto the WTRU. The happy bit is a single bit field that is passed from theMAC entity to the physical layer for inclusion on an E-DCH dedicatedphysical control channel (E-DPCCH). The happy bit may be set to either“happy” or “not happy.” “Happy” indicates that the WTRU could use moreresources, and “not happy” indicates that the WTRU could not use moreresources. The setting of the happy bit is also based on the TEBS.

One of the conditions to set the happy bit to “not happy” is if the TEBSwould require more than Happy_bit_delay_condition ms to be transmittedwith the current serving grant×the ratio of active HARQ processes to thetotal number of HARQ processes.

According to the current 3GPP specifications, the TEBS sent as part ofthe scheduling information only indicates the total amount of data inbytes that is available across all logical channels that are availablefor transmission and retransmission in the RLC layer. However, with theintroduction of segmentation capabilities in the MAC entity, (i.e.,MAC-i/is entity), the MAC entity may have one or more segments stored inthe segmentation entity. The total number of bytes waiting in theMAC-i/is segmentation entity is not included in the TEBS calculation.Due to the fact that the introduction of flexible RLC PDUs allows theRLC entity to create RLC PDUs of a size up to the maximum RLC PDU size,the number of bits stored in the segmentation entity could be relativelyhigh. Therefore, by not including the amount of data stored in the MAClayer segmentation entity, the WTRU reports an incorrect TEBS. Since theWTRU requires additional resources to transmit the segments stored inthe MAC layer segmentation entity, by not reporting them, the networkwill obtain an incorrect view of the number of resources required by theWTRU.

Additionally, where the network decreases the grant of the WTRU to zerothe WTRU may still have some data in the MAC layer segmentation entityto transmit. The current scheduling information triggering mechanismsallow the WTRU to send the scheduling information if the TEBS becomeslarger than zero and the serving grant is zero. However, if TEBS is zerobut the WTRU has some remaining data in the MAC layer segmentationentity, the WTRU transmission will stall in that situation. Thetriggering criteria will not allow the WTRU to send a TEBS and thus thenetwork will not know that the WTRU requires additional resources tosuccessfully complete the transmission of the data in its buffer. Thiswill delay transmission and prevent the WTRU from completingtransmission of the data.

The setting of the happy bit is also dependent on the TEBS. If TEBS iszero or if TEBS is incorrectly set and the WTRU has one or more MACsegments in the MAC layer segmentation entity, the WTRU will not set thehappy bit properly. Due to the fact that the TEBS is underestimated, theWTRU might calculate that the WTRU is able to transmit the data withinthe delay restrictions. However, if the data contained in the MAC layerwas taken into consideration the WTRU may not be able to satisfy thedelay criteria.

SUMMARY

A WTRU reports a buffer status as part of scheduling information forE-DCH transmissions. For reporting the buffer status, the WTRUcalculates a total amount of data available across all logical channelsfor which reporting is requested by a radio resource control (RRC)entity. The total amount of data includes an amount of data that isavailable for transmission and retransmission at an RLC entity and anamount of data that is available for transmission in a MAC-i/issegmentation entity in case that a MAC-i/is entity is configured. TheWTRU sends scheduling information including a TEBS field that is setbased on the total amount of data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more detailed understanding may be had from the following description,given by way of example in conjunction with the accompanying drawingswherein:

FIG. 1 shows a wireless communication system;

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a WTRU and the Node-B of thewireless communication system of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example process of reporting TEBS inaccordance with a first embodiment; and

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example process of reporting a bufferstatus and sending scheduling information in accordance with a secondembodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

When referred to hereafter, the terminology “WTRU” includes but is notlimited to a user equipment (UE), a mobile station, a fixed or mobilesubscriber unit, a pager, a cellular telephone, a personal digitalassistant (PDA), a computer, or any other type of user device capable ofoperating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, theterminology “Node B” includes but is not limited to a base station, asite controller, an access point (AP), or any other type of interfacingdevice capable of operating in a wireless environment. The terminologies“MAC-is/i” and “MAC-i/is” may be used interchangeably.

FIG. 1 shows a wireless communication system 100 including a pluralityof WTRUs 110, a Node B 120, a controlling radio network controller(CRNC) 130, a serving radio network controller (SRNC) 140, and a corenetwork 150. The Node B 120 and the CRNC 130 may collectively bereferred to as the universal terrestrial radio access network (UTRAN).

As shown in FIG. 1, the WTRUs 110 are in communication with the Node B120, which is in communication with the CRNC 130 and the SRNC 140.Although three WTRUs 110, one Node B 120, one CRNC 130, and one SRNC 140are shown in FIG. 1, it should be noted that any combination of wirelessand wired devices may be included in the wireless communication system100.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a WTRU 110 and the Node B 120 ofthe wireless communication system 100 of FIG. 1. As shown in FIG. 2, theWTRU 110 is in communication with the Node B 120 and both are configuredto perform a method of reporting a buffer status.

In addition to the components that may be found in a typical WTRU, theWTRU 110 includes a processor 115, a receiver 116, a transmitter 117, amemory 118, and an antenna 119. The memory 118 is provided to storesoftware including operating system, application, etc. The processor 115is provided to perform, alone or in association with the software, amethod of reporting a buffer status in accordance with embodimentsdisclosed below. For example, the processor 115 is configured tocalculate a total amount of data available across all logical channelsfor which reporting is requested, including an amount of data that isavailable for transmission and retransmission at an RLC entity and anamount of data that is available for transmission in a segmentationentity of a medium access control sub-layer for enhanced dedicatedchannel (MAC-i/is), and send scheduling information including a TEBSfield that is set based on the total amount of data. The receiver 116and the transmitter 117 are in communication with the processor 115. Theantenna 119 is in communication with both the receiver 116 and thetransmitter 117 to facilitate the transmission and reception of wirelessdata.

In addition to the components that may be found in a typical basestation, the Node B 120 includes a processor 125, a receiver 126, atransmitter 127, a memory 128, and an antenna 129. The processor 125 isconfigured to support a method of reporting a buffer status inaccordance with any embodiments disclosed below. The receiver 126 andthe transmitter 127 are in communication with the processor 125. Theantenna 129 is in communication with both the receiver 126 and thetransmitter 127 to facilitate the transmission and reception of wirelessdata.

In accordance with a first embodiment, the definition of TEBS ismodified such that the TEBS field identifies the total amount of dataavailable across all logical channels (including data stored in the RLCand MAC-i/is) for which reporting has been requested by the RRC andindicates the amount of data in number of bytes that is available fortransmission and retransmission in RLC and for transmission in thesegmentation entities of the MAC-i/is entity.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example process 300 of reporting TEBS inaccordance with a first embodiment. A WTRU calculates a total amount ofdata available across all logical channels for which reporting isrequested by RRC (step 302). In calculating the total amount of data,the WTRU includes an amount of data that is available for transmissionand retransmission at an RLC entity and an amount of data that isavailable for transmission in a MAC-i/is segmentation entity in casethat a MAC-i/is entity is configured. The WTRU then sends schedulinginformation including a TEBS field that is set based on the total amountof data (step 304).

The segments that are stored in the MAC-i/is segmentation entity thatbelongs to a logical channel for which a non-scheduled grant isconfigured may not be included in the total amount of data. In addition,the segments that are stored in the MAC-i/is segmentation entity thatbelongs to a logical channel that the RRC has restricted applicabilitymay not be included in the total amount of data. When MAC is connectedto an acknowledged mode (AM) RLC entity, control PDUs to be transmittedand RLC PDUs outside the RLC Tx window may also be included in the TEBS.RLC PDUs that have been transmitted but not negatively acknowledged bythe peer entity may not be included in the TEBS.

The first embodiment may be applied to highest priority logical channelbuffer status (HLBS) calculation as well. The HLBS may indicate theamount of data available from the logical channel identified by thehighest priority logical channel identity (HLID) field, including theamount of data that is available for transmission and retransmission inRLC and for transmission in the segmentation entities of the MAC-i/isentities, relative to the highest value of the buffer size rangereported by TEBS or relative to a pre-determined number of bytes, (e.g.,50,000 bytes), depending on the TEBS index.

In accordance with a second embodiment, the definition of the TEBS isnot modified, but the scheduling information triggering criteria ismodified. FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example process 400 ofreporting a buffer status and sending scheduling information inaccordance with a second embodiment. A WTRU calculates a TEBS and atotal amount of data stored in the MAC-i/is segmentation entity (step402). The MAC-i/is segmentation entity buffer status is referred to as“total MAC buffer status” (TMBS). The TMBS identifies the total amountof data in bytes available across all logical channels for whichreporting has been requested by the RRC that is available fortransmission in the segmentation entities of the MAC-i/is entity.

The segments that are stored in the segmentation entity of the MAC-i/isthat belongs to a logical channel for which a non-scheduled grant isconfigured may not be taken into account when calculating the TMBSvalue. In addition, the segments that are stored in the segmentationentity of the MAC-i/is that belong to a logical channel which the RRChas restricted applicability may not be counted in the TMBS calculation.

The WTRU determines whether a modified scheduling information triggeringcriterion is satisfied (step 404). If so, the WTRU triggers transmissionof scheduling information (step 406). If not, scheduling informationreporting is not triggered.

The scheduling information may be triggered if at least one of thefollowing conditions is satisfied: (1) The serving grant is equal to“zero” or all HARQ processes are deactivated, and the TEBS becomeslarger than zero or the TMBS is larger than zero (or alternativelylarger than a configured threshold); (2) The serving grant is equal to“zero” or all HARQ processes are deactivated, and the sum of TEBS andTMBS is larger than zero (or alternatively larger than a configuredthreshold); (3) The serving grant is equal to “zero” or all HARQprocesses are deactivated, and TEBS is zero and TMBS is larger thanzero; or (4) Periodic triggering. The scheduling information may betriggered if the serving grant is zero or all HARQ processes aredeactivated, and TEBS or TMBS is larger than zero (or alternatively TMBSis larger than a threshold or the sum of TEBS and TMBS is larger than athreshold). In this case, T_SING may be used as a timer to determine theperiodicity of the triggering. The scheduling information may also betriggered if the serving grant is non-zero and at lease one HARQ processis activated and TEBS is zero but TMBS is non-zero.

In accordance with the current 3GPP specification, schedulinginformation shall not be transmitted if the TEBS is zero, even if it wastriggered by one of the configured triggering mechanisms. In accordancewith the second embodiment, this rule is modified such that thescheduling information shall not be transmitted if both TEBS and TMBSare zero (alternatively the sum of TEBS and TMBS are zero), even if itwas triggered by one of the configured triggering mechanisms.

When one of the above scheduling information triggering criteria issatisfied and TEBS is zero but the TMBS is non-zero, the TMBS value maybe reported in the TEBS field of the scheduling information.Alternatively, TEBS zero may be allowed to be reported but a new fieldmay be added to the scheduling information to indicate that data isavailable in the MAC segmentation entity. The new field may be one bit,just indicating that some data is available in the MAC entity, or a fewbits to indicate an index to a TMBS value range.

Alternatively, TEBS zero may be allowed to be reported but one of thefields may be reinterpreted to indicate the TMBS value. For example, theHLBS field may be used to indicate the TMBS. The network may beconfigured to know that if TEBS is zero and the HLBS field is non-zero,it implies that the HLBS field contains the TMBS value. Alternatively,TEBS zero may be signaled and a happy bit may be set to “unhappy” ifTMBS is larger than zero. Alternatively, TEBS zero may be reported butthe HLID field may be reinterpreted to indicate the TMBS value.

The same concept may be applied to the triggering of the happy bit. Thecondition for triggering the happy bit is modified such that the happybit is set to “unhappy” if the sum of TEBS and TMBS would require morethan Happy_bit_delay condition ms to be transmitted with the currentserving grant×the ratio of active HARQ processes to the total number ofHARQ processes.

Regardless of whether TEBS is equal to zero or not, the WTRU may alwaysreport the sum of TEBS and TMBS within the “TEBS” field of thescheduling information, whenever MAC-i/is is configured. If this schemeis used, then the name of the “TEBS” field within the schedulinginformation may be replaced with a different name, (e.g., total E-DCHbuffer status with segmentation (TEBSS)), to avoid confusion with theconventional definition of TEBS.

In accordance with a third embodiment, data stored in the segmentationentity of the MAC-i/is entity may be discarded under certain conditionsto avoid wasting resources attempting to transmit the data. In case thata WTRU has a stored segment in the MAC entity which cannot betransmitted for a certain period of time due to limited grant, channelpriority, or the like, if a pre-configured time elapses between thetransmission of the latest segment and the stored segment, it would bebeneficial to discard this segment since either its transmission delaywould be too large to be of use to higher layers, or the RLC PDUincluding this segment would be retransmitted in its entirety.

Data in the segmentation entity may be discarded if the serving grant isequal to “zero” or all HARQ processes are de-activated. In this case thedata may be discarded for all logical channels, or alternatively for alllogical channels mapped to a scheduled flow.

Data in the segmentation entity may also be discarded if a discard timerexpired. The discard timer may be specific to a certain logical channel.In this case the discard timer may be started upon arrival of data froma certain PDU in the segmentation entity for this logical channel, andstopped when all data from this PDU is transmitted. When the discardtimer expires the data from only the concerned logical channel isdiscarded. Alternatively, the discard timer may be unique across alllogical channels. In this case the discard timer may be started when theserving grant is equal to “zero” or when all HARQ processes arede-activated, and stopped when the serving grant becomes higher thanzero. When the discard timer expires the data may be discarded for alllogical channels, or alternatively for all logical channels mapped to ascheduled flow.

Although features and elements are described above in particularcombinations, each feature or element can be used alone without theother features and elements or in various combinations with or withoutother features and elements. The methods or flow charts provided hereinmay be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmwareincorporated in a computer-readable storage medium for execution by ageneral purpose computer or a processor. Examples of computer-readablestorage mediums include a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory(RAM), a register, cache memory, semiconductor memory devices, magneticmedia such as internal hard disks and removable disks, magneto-opticalmedia, and optical media such as CD-ROM disks, and digital versatiledisks (DVDs).

Suitable processors include, by way of example, a general purposeprocessor, a special purpose processor, a conventional processor, adigital signal processor (DSP), a plurality of microprocessors, one ormore microprocessors in association with a DSP core, a controller, amicrocontroller, Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), FieldProgrammable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) circuits, any other type of integratedcircuit (IC), and/or a state machine.

A processor in association with software may be used to implement aradio frequency transceiver for use in a wireless transmit receive unit(WTRU), user equipment (UE), terminal, base station, radio networkcontroller (RNC), or any host computer. The WTRU may be used inconjunction with modules, implemented in hardware and/or software, suchas a camera, a video camera module, a videophone, a speakerphone, avibration device, a speaker, a microphone, a television transceiver, ahands free headset, a keyboard, a Bluetooth® module, a frequencymodulated (FM) radio unit, a liquid crystal display (LCD) display unit,an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display unit, a digital musicplayer, a media player, a video game player module, an Internet browser,and/or any wireless local area network (WLAN) or Ultra Wide Band (UWB)module.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for use in a wireless transmit receiveunit (WTRU) comprising: calculating an amount of data available fortransmission across one or more logical channels including an amount ofdata available for transmission in a radio link control (RLC) entity anda medium access control (MAC) segmentation entity; and transmitting ascheduling information message to a serving Node B, wherein thescheduling information message includes an amount of data that isavailable across one or more logical channels for transmission andretransmission in the RLC entity and available for transmission in theMAC segmentation entity.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the schedulinginformation message includes a total E-DCH buffer status (TEBS) field.3. The method of claim 2 wherein the TEBS field indicates the amount ofdata that is available for transmission and retransmission in the RLCentity and available for transmission in the MAC segmentation entity. 4.The method of claim 1 wherein the scheduling information messagerequests enhanced dedicated channel (E-DCH) resources from the servingNode B.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the scheduling informationmessage does not include data associated with a non-scheduled grant. 6.The method of claim 1 wherein the scheduling information messageincludes a highest priority logical channel buffer status (HLBS) field.7. The method of claim 6 wherein the HLBS field indicates the amount ofdata available from a logical channel identified by a highest prioritylogical channel identity (HLID) field.
 8. The method of claim 1 whereinthe scheduling information message is not transmitted if the amount ofdata that is available for transmission and retransmission in the RLCentity and available for transmission in the MAC segmentation entity iszero.
 9. A wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) comprising: a processorconfigured to calculate an amount of data available for transmissionacross one or more logical channels including an amount of dataavailable for transmission in a radio link control (RLC) entity and amedium access control (MAC) segmentation entity; and a transmitterconfigured to transmit a scheduling information message to a servingNode B, wherein the scheduling information message includes an amount ofdata that is available across one or more logical channels fortransmission and retransmission in the RLC entity and available fortransmission in the MAC segmentation entity.
 10. The WTRU of claim 9wherein the scheduling information message includes a total E-DCH bufferstatus (TEBS) field.
 11. The WTRU of claim 10 wherein the TEBS fieldindicates the amount of data that is available for transmission andretransmission in the RLC entity and available for transmission in theMAC segmentation entity.
 12. The WTRU of claim 9 wherein the schedulinginformation message requests enhanced dedicated channel (E-DCH)resources from the serving Node B.
 13. The WTRU of claim 9 wherein thescheduling information message does not include data associated with anon-scheduled grant.
 14. The WTRU of claim 9 wherein the schedulinginformation message includes a highest priority logical channel bufferstatus (HLBS) field.
 15. The WTRU of claim 14 wherein the HLBS fieldindicates the amount of data available from a logical channel identifiedby a highest priority logical channel identity (HLID) field.
 16. TheWTRU of claim 9 wherein the scheduling information message is nottransmitted if the amount of data that is available for transmission andretransmission in the RLC entity and available for transmission in theMAC segmentation entity is zero.